دانشگاه اصفهان فنون ادبی 20088027 9 1 2017 04 21 The archetypal criticism of "Hooshroba Castle" story نقد کهن‌الگویی داستان «دژ هوش‌ربا» 109 118 21397 10.22108/liar.2017.21397 FA جلیل مشیدی دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران سونیا نوری دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران Journal Article 2014 04 25 Archetypes are some shared concepts which are accumulated in collective unconscious. Archetypal criticism could be defined a branch of literary criticism which deals with analyzing archetypes in a literary work. Archetypes are some concealed things and symbols can make them reveal. Jung believes “archetype’s origin is unknown. They might appear anytime and anywhere; even if transforming of Human origin or racial combinations is ignored by emigration” (Jung, 1352: 106). Archetypal criticism started out of the literature in addition to Jung James Frazer, Scottish anthropologist, the first theorist was that introduced archetypes, but archetypes are known by Jung and mostly consider idiomatic belongs to Jung. Maud Bodkin the first in "archetypal designs in poetry" by interpreting mythic Coleridge's poems, and Eliot, brought literature Jung's ideas and Frazer and others, such as Robert Graves, Robert Graves, Wilson Knight, Richard Chase and … continued Bodkin way to and finally Northrop Frye recognize that the archetypal criticism along with other forms of modern literary criticism and left it of domination anthropology and psychology. Also called the archetypal criticism mythical criticism, because in principle archetypes derived from myths. Myths are related to the course of human civilization be remembered that as human childhood. <br />According to Jungian theory, collective unconscious human thought is consistent with the preliminary stage and belongs to the time until then he was not out to conquer the world and pay attention to the inner the human and tried In mythology says Your inner psychological discoveries pursued. So “The main public symbols inheritable and archetypes perception” (Sattari, 1366: 499). The myth reflects the inner life and the human's wishes that do not go out of her life time and space will not be able to narrow it, that is, why the myths around the world constituent elements are identical or very similar.“Universal archetypes are the collective unconscious and are inherited from our ancestors” (Cuddon, 1380: 39). The basic fact of life archetype such as birth, growing up, love, family and tribal life, death ...at the same concepts as the archetype known myths. Elements such as death and rebirth, hero's journey, an old wise man, anima and animus, shadow. The archetypal criticism based on inter-textuality to look at the literature and a relationship based on dialogue among literary works have been written based on archetypes believes. <br />"Zat os-Sovar Castle" storyis one of the most mysterious talesof Masnavi and it is more mysteriously unfinished. Checking archetypal story of "Zat os-Sovar Castle"shows that archetype in this story has a special place. The story begins with the heroes of the adventure trip which is known archetypes. The old wise man in the form of three characters, namely the father, the old man will appear enlightened and king China. King of China's daughter the owner image of the beautiful castle, man is a manifestation of the female psyche Anima they say. Shadow of the dark side of the human psyche and the origin of evil traits, in the second brother to be seen and adverse effects on the soul leaves his. Mask or persona archetype also is seen in the behavior of the king of China When unaware that his show and the secret are their spiritual brothers. The loss of brothers and another brother replacing the frequently happens in the story, reminiscent of the archetype of death and rebirth is and in the end, according to the story's elements and characters, the myth of the creation of the first man to be seen. By analyzing this archetype can be hidden concepts in this part of the Masnavi and realized similar literary works and the benefit. کهن­ الگوها مفاهیم مشترکی هستند که در طول سالیان، در ناخودآگاه بشر انباشته شده­اند. نقد کهن­الگویی یکی از شاخه­های نقد ادبی جدید است که به بررسی کهن­الگوهای موجود در یک اثر ادبی می­پردازد. در این مجال، ضمن پرداختن به تاریخچه و پایه‌ریزان نقد کهن­الگویی، پاره­ای از اصطلاحات کلیدی این نوع نقد، همچون ناخودآگاهی، کهن­الگو، به اختصار بررسی شده­اند و نیز به کهن­الگوهایی از قبیل «قهرمان»، «سفر قهرمان»، «پیر خردمند»، «آنیما»، «سایه»، «مرگ و تولد مجدد» و «نقاب» که از اصلی‌ترینِ آنها هستند، بر اساس نظریات <em>یونگ</em>، در داستان «دژ هوش ­ربا» پرداخته شده­ است https://liar.ui.ac.ir/article_21397_10a8989f0a64657bc95fd83c0b3a4f89.pdf