<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Literary Arts</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>20088027</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparative critical study of riming prose in Persian and Arabic Rhetoric</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparative critical study of riming prose in Persian and Arabic Rhetoric</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>43</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>66</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">23259</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/liar.2019.93948.0</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sakine</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghorbani</LastName>
<Affiliation>M. A. Student of Persian Languages and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mortezaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0009-0009-0009</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Abstract&lt;br /&gt;Riming prose which is a Figure of speech based on array of words, has been&lt;br /&gt;discussed in most rhetorical works of Persian and Arabic. The purpose of this article&lt;br /&gt;is the evolution of this figure of speech critically and comparatively from early days&lt;br /&gt;of writing rhetoric books to the contemporary time. For this purpose, the historical&lt;br /&gt;development of this figure of speech has been investigated based on the time and&lt;br /&gt;language of writing these rhetorical works. Different definitions about this figure of&lt;br /&gt;speech are presented in these works, some of which have been translated and&lt;br /&gt;narrated from previous works. Altogether, equality of end and rhythm of words are&lt;br /&gt;the main criterions of riming prose but each of the authors has expressed this equality&lt;br /&gt;and harmony in various ways and presented different views on it.&lt;br /&gt;In this article, for better understand and ease of work, types of riming prose and&lt;br /&gt;related figures of speech to it have been categorized and criticized differently.&lt;br /&gt;Riming prose for observance the principles and rules of equality, and its position at&lt;br /&gt;the end of the dialects has been divided into parallel, symmetrical and lop- sided&lt;br /&gt;types. For this reason, we recall these types main that are located in their main place;&lt;br /&gt;at the end of spoken parts and phrases. Riming prose for the length of the rimed&lt;br /&gt;prose sentences and the number of these words are divided in the form of Short,&lt;br /&gt;medium and long. Given the main position of riming prose, if this figure of speech is&lt;br /&gt;used in most of the words of the spoken parts and sentences or in the middle terms of&lt;br /&gt;them, some of other forms of figures of speech are created which inlaying,&lt;br /&gt;Parallelism and Guaranteed Portmanteau are the most important ones. And if the&lt;br /&gt;main types of riming prose are used in the poem or more precisely, in the parts and&lt;br /&gt;sections of hemistiches and verses, other figures of speech are created such as tashtir,&lt;br /&gt;tasmit, and tajziye. Some of the types that rhetorical scholars and authors have come&lt;br /&gt;up with the following of riming prose are completely null and void, and indication of&lt;br /&gt;their ignorance and inattention in the historical background of riming prose. They&lt;br /&gt;have been added these types with the aim of creation and innovating without any&lt;br /&gt;rules and regulations. For this reason, these types have been studied below in vain&lt;br /&gt;types.&lt;br /&gt;After studying the evolution of the types of riming prose and all figures of speech&lt;br /&gt;mentioned and comparing Arabic and Iranian experts&#039; outlooks in different periods,&lt;br /&gt;this can be concluded that there are slight differences regarding principles and&lt;br /&gt; M. A. Student of Persian Languages and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran&lt;br /&gt;ghorbanisakine@gmail.com&lt;br /&gt; Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,&lt;br /&gt;Mashhad, Iran&lt;br /&gt;Received: 13/07/2015 Accepted: 15/03/2016&lt;br /&gt;This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&lt;br /&gt;Literary Arts, 10th Year, No. 25, Winter 2018-2019&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;methods of using riming prose. Persian rhetoricians have been affected by Arabic&lt;br /&gt;rhetoricians for the totality of investigated figures and they have created slight&lt;br /&gt;innovations in methods and rules of figures of speech. However, there are&lt;br /&gt;deficiencies in defining riming prose and its principles and rules which resulted in&lt;br /&gt;deviations and errors in defining its types at the level of the word and in the poem.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Abstract&lt;br /&gt;Riming prose which is a Figure of speech based on array of words, has been&lt;br /&gt;discussed in most rhetorical works of Persian and Arabic. The purpose of this article&lt;br /&gt;is the evolution of this figure of speech critically and comparatively from early days&lt;br /&gt;of writing rhetoric books to the contemporary time. For this purpose, the historical&lt;br /&gt;development of this figure of speech has been investigated based on the time and&lt;br /&gt;language of writing these rhetorical works. Different definitions about this figure of&lt;br /&gt;speech are presented in these works, some of which have been translated and&lt;br /&gt;narrated from previous works. Altogether, equality of end and rhythm of words are&lt;br /&gt;the main criterions of riming prose but each of the authors has expressed this equality&lt;br /&gt;and harmony in various ways and presented different views on it.&lt;br /&gt;In this article, for better understand and ease of work, types of riming prose and&lt;br /&gt;related figures of speech to it have been categorized and criticized differently.&lt;br /&gt;Riming prose for observance the principles and rules of equality, and its position at&lt;br /&gt;the end of the dialects has been divided into parallel, symmetrical and lop- sided&lt;br /&gt;types. For this reason, we recall these types main that are located in their main place;&lt;br /&gt;at the end of spoken parts and phrases. Riming prose for the length of the rimed&lt;br /&gt;prose sentences and the number of these words are divided in the form of Short,&lt;br /&gt;medium and long. Given the main position of riming prose, if this figure of speech is&lt;br /&gt;used in most of the words of the spoken parts and sentences or in the middle terms of&lt;br /&gt;them, some of other forms of figures of speech are created which inlaying,&lt;br /&gt;Parallelism and Guaranteed Portmanteau are the most important ones. And if the&lt;br /&gt;main types of riming prose are used in the poem or more precisely, in the parts and&lt;br /&gt;sections of hemistiches and verses, other figures of speech are created such as tashtir,&lt;br /&gt;tasmit, and tajziye. Some of the types that rhetorical scholars and authors have come&lt;br /&gt;up with the following of riming prose are completely null and void, and indication of&lt;br /&gt;their ignorance and inattention in the historical background of riming prose. They&lt;br /&gt;have been added these types with the aim of creation and innovating without any&lt;br /&gt;rules and regulations. For this reason, these types have been studied below in vain&lt;br /&gt;types.&lt;br /&gt;After studying the evolution of the types of riming prose and all figures of speech&lt;br /&gt;mentioned and comparing Arabic and Iranian experts&#039; outlooks in different periods,&lt;br /&gt;this can be concluded that there are slight differences regarding principles and&lt;br /&gt; M. A. Student of Persian Languages and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran&lt;br /&gt;ghorbanisakine@gmail.com&lt;br /&gt; Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,&lt;br /&gt;Mashhad, Iran&lt;br /&gt;Received: 13/07/2015 Accepted: 15/03/2016&lt;br /&gt;This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&lt;br /&gt;Literary Arts, 10th Year, No. 25, Winter 2018-2019&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;methods of using riming prose. Persian rhetoricians have been affected by Arabic&lt;br /&gt;rhetoricians for the totality of investigated figures and they have created slight&lt;br /&gt;innovations in methods and rules of figures of speech. However, there are&lt;br /&gt;deficiencies in defining riming prose and its principles and rules which resulted in&lt;br /&gt;deviations and errors in defining its types at the level of the word and in the poem.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Riming prose</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Arabic Rhetoric</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Persian Rhetoric</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The Evolution of Figures of speech</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Comparative Rhetoric</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://liar.ui.ac.ir/article_23259_14de22b06297fb8221cdfd1144f5303d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
