Narratology of Kalile and Demne Anecdotes at the level of Story Relying on King and Barhamnan’s Anecdote

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. Student of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Eslamshar Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the present paper, Kalile and Demne anecdotes relying on King and Barhamnan’s anecdote have been investigated from structural narratologist’s point of view. In the main body of the paper, at first the threefold levels of a narrative text; that is, story, discourse, and narratology have been introduced, then the anecdote of “King and Barhamnan” at the level of “story” and its three – dimensional components; that is, plot, character, and suspense have been studied.
Plot, is one of the elements of the story, and is an indicative of the motivation and the purpose of the story events. Plot is mentioned as a map, plan, network of discursive events and pattern of story events which is consisting of base sequences and sub-sequences. These sequences can be combined in three ways in the narrative:

Embedded bonding: it is a story within another story such as the stories of Marzban Name.
Chain bonding: in this type of bonding, the sequences like the rings of chain come together one after another such as the story of The Seven Labors of Rostam or Haft-Khan-e-Rostam
Alternating bonding or intercross of sequences: in this type the narrator advances two or more story in parallel.

In the story of King and Brahman, the combination of sequences is homogeneous and hierarchical that has a significant compatibility with the theory of "Dynasty" or "part" of Roland Barthes in roles. The author leads the story that has begun with an "unstable situation" in the first series into a "constant situation" at the final series (sixth) rely on positive and dynamic character and the protagonist of the story.
In the field of character the pattern of Greimas "activist" follows a hexagonal structure (the transmitter, goal, receiver / contributor, agent, retardant). Heblar (the king) is transmitter. At first it seems that the Brahmans are the subject of this story, but with the progress of story and the reveal of Brahman's nature their character change its place from subject into competition and anti-hero position; in return the doings and actions of Irandokht, the wife of the king, turns her into the subject and agent of the story. The purpose is dream interpretation and disposal of possible risk caused by terrible sleep; receptors are all those who Brahmans decide to kill such as Heblar's wife and children and his secretary and minister and the white elephant and camel ... as well as the realm of the king and kingdom; the contributor of the Belar, the minister, and Idon, the wise man; and Brahman are considered as rivals and as a retardant.
Within the scope of suspension the author has succeeded to create influential roles of different forms of suspension in creation of mixture of doubt and expect, particularly, methods such as "the ignorant of readers to the future of the characters and setting of the main character at a crossroads".
In general, it is said that Kalile and Demne anecdotes conform to the structural narratologist’s opinions. In conclusion, we can almost delineate a similar narrative structure for Kalile and Demne anecdotes.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
-        Afkhami, A. (2003). Linguistic and narrative. Journal of Literature and Human Sciences Faculty of University of Tehran. Pp. 55- 72.
-        Ahmadi, B. (2010). The structure and interpretation of the text. No XII, Tehran: Markaz.
-        Akhlaqi, A. (1998). The analysis of the logical structure of Manteq ot-ateir. Isfahan: Farda.
-        Azad, R. (2009). "The narratology of Hamidi's Maqamat based on Todorov's theory". Journal of Literary Studies. No. 26. pp. 9- 32.
-        Barth, R. (2008).Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives, Mohammad Ragheb (trans.), Tehran: Farhang-e Saba.
-        Biniaz, F. (2009). An introduction to fiction and narrative, 2nd ed., Tehran: Afraz.
-        Daad, S. (2006). Dictionary of Literary terms. 3rd ed., Tehran: Morvarid.
-        Daghighian, Sh. (1992). The origin of the character in fiction: Research on the prototype in literary creation, Tehran: Nevisande.
-        Eagleton, D. (2009). Precursor to literary theory, translation of Abbas Mokhber; 5th ed., Tehran: Markaz.
-        Eshaghian, J. (2008). A way into the labyrinth of modern novel. Tehran: GolAzin.
-        Fatemi, S. H. and M. Dorpar. (2009)."The mechanisms of Khosrow and Shirin characters in Nezami." literary magazine. S 42. No. 167. pp. 53- 57.
-        Ganji, N. et al. (2010). The literal and idiomatic investigation of plot and its structural elements in Persian and Arabic. Language study. Publications of Az-Zahra University. Y 1. No. 2. pp. 131: 172.
-        Ghasempour, P. (2009). "Analysis of the structure of the narrative and narrator based on Nezami Haft Peykar".Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities University of Bahonarkerman. No. 25, pp. 189- 205.
-        Horri, A. (2009). Component of time and space in Quranic narrative. Publication of literary scholars. The 7th and 8th pp. 125- 141.
-        ______. (2009)."The correlation between colorful representation of speech and thought focused on free indirect speech". Journal of Literary Criticism. Y 2. No. 7. pp. 59- 78.
-        Khosravi, A. (2009). Marginalized on the basis of the story. Tehran: Sales.
-        Lotte, Y. (2009). Narration in film and literature, Omid Nik Farjam; 2nd ed., Tehran: Minoo Kherad.
-        Mandanipour, Sh. (2001). The book of Shahrzad spirits, Tehran: Qoqnoos.
-        Mastoor, M. (2000). Foundations of short stories, Tehran: Markaz.
-        Miqdadi, B. (1999). Glossary of literary criticism (from Plato to the present day), Tehran: Fekr  Naw.
-        Mirsadeghi, J. & M. Mirsadeghi. (1998). Dictionary of the art of fiction, Tehran: Mahnar.
-        Mirsadeghi, J. (2009). Elements of the story, 6th ed., Tehran: Sokhan.
-        ______. (2007). Literary fiction: fiction, romance, short stories and novels; 5th ed., Tehran: Sokhan.
-        Mohammadi, M. H. (1999). A critique of the methodology of children's literature, Tehran: Soroush.
-        Monshi, N. (1991). Kalila va Dimnah. Mojtaba Minooie (trans., emend. and exp.) Tehran: Amir Kabir.
-        Moshtaghmehr, R. & S. Karimi Qara Baba (2008). Narratology of short stories of Mohammad Ali Jamal-zadeh. Journal of Literature and Human Sciences Faculty of University of Tabriz, Department of Persian Language and Literature. Y 51. No. 207. pp. 61- 135.
-        Okhovat, A. (1992). Grammar of the story. Isfahan: Farda.
-        Rasouli, H. and A. Abbasi. (2008). Narrative function in the copying Hasanak Minister of Beyhaqi history. Journal of foreign language studies. No. 45. pp. 97 -81.
-        Raymond Kennan, Sh. (2008). Narrative poetics of contemporary, Abolfazl Horri (trans.), Tehran: Niloofar.
-        Rezaei, A. A. (2003). Literature descriptive words, Tehran: Farhange Moaser.
-        Safiee, k. (Without date). The application of narrative structure analysis: analysis of the validity of the play the meeting an old lady by Friedrich Dürrenmatt on the basis of Roland Barthes", Comparative Literature. No. 11. pp. 145, 165.
-        Sahba, F. (2008). The investigation of time in Beyhaqi history based on the theory of narrative time.  Literary Researches Journal. Y 5. No. 21. pp. 89- 111.
-        Scholes, R. (2004). Introduction to structuralism in literature, Farzaneh Taheri (trans.), 2nd ed., Tehran: Agah.
-        Selden, R. (1999). Guide to contemporary literary theory, Abbas Mokhber (trans.), 4th ed., Tehran: Tarhe no.
-        Tulane, M. (2007). Narratology: An Introduction to Linguistic – Critical, Sayyida Fatima Alavi and Fatima Nemati (trans.), Tehran: Samt.
-        Webster, R. (2003). A prelude to the study of literary theory, Elahe Dehnavi (trans.), Tehran: Rooznegar.