Rethinking the Necessity of Critical Thinking and Its Functions in Tadhkirah (Memorandum) and Literary Historiography

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. Student of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Torbat Heydariyeh Branch, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Hakim Sabzevari University, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Hakim Sabzevari University, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Torbat Heydariyeh Branch, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The field of the history of literature is the genealogy of the culture of thought. Literary biography (Tadhkirah), as the first generation of the history of Persian literature, reflects the rise and fall of culture, literature, the acceptance of tradition and traditionalism, and the mirror of literary flow that can show the process of evolution and degradation-imitation in the literature. Tadhkirah contributes to the development of literary research, the introduction of literary traditions, indigenous language and literature, and national identity. However, despite the advantages of the Tadhkirah, there are flaws such as superficiality, celibacy, prostration, succinct writing, and chanting that have found their way into a number of Tadhkirahs. The history of literature needs to have a pathological look within itself in order to achieve growth and maturity. Pathology means identifying the negative aspects and purifying Tadhkirah. The pathology of Tadhkirah requires the use of ‘critical thinking’ to avoid illusory traditions and expositors and to acquaint the reader with the situational context of the creation of the text. Critical thinking provides us with the tools for the purposeful, accurate, and scientific evaluation of Tadhkirah.
 
Methodology
This descriptive-analytical study was done using the library method.It aimed to use a pathology approach in the field of history and literature in order to show the strengths and weaknesses of such studies inductively.
 
Discussion
The most basic tool for recognizing Tadhkirah is through using a critical approach. The pathology of Tadhkirah reveals some shortcomings and inadequacies. Therefore, it is necessary to look critically at the study of tradition, developments, and the decline of imitation to understand why in a historical period literary works were profound while in another period they became weak. Literary criticism mediates between the writer of the literary work and the ordinary reader by presenting the subtleties of literary works to the general public and streamlining the evolution of literary tastes. Criticizing Tadhkirah can identify stylistic, rhetorical, sociological, and psychological aspects in the production of science and knowledge.
 
Results and Conclusions
Tadhkirahs and histories of literature are a reflection of the culture and thought of a nation, the ups and downs of literature and culture. They can play a role in the analysis and understanding of literary texts. These works can well show the two opposites (evolution versus degeneration-imitation) in the context of the dynamics and statics of forms and themes. Tadhkirahs play a role in the expansion of literary studies, the acquisition of methods and criteria in literary historiography, the explanation of critical discourse and approaches, the cognition of study of literary trends and reflection of historical-literary events, the recognition of literary traditions, national identity and the interpretation of traditions, the description of aesthetic taste and the method of critique of literary predecessors, introducing native literature and ethnic, local and regional languages​. But ambiguity, superficial generalization, haste, ignorance, exaggeration, rhetoric, love and hate, avoidance of firm and justified views have penetrated Tadhkirah. It is necessary to turn to critical thinking and pathology of such research.
Using critical thinking in the study and analysis of Tadhkirah could lead to avoiding false imitation, and perverted literary traditions for pragmatism, destiny, passivity, perversion, bigotry, and contention against promotion and improvement, restoring data functions and improving the level of information of in the expansion of historical information in Tadhkirahs literary, attention to  the level of perceptions and expectations in today's readers of the Tadhkirah and the contemporary researchers with the situational context of the creation of the text of the Tadhkirah and the perceptions and expectations of the traditional memoirist, improving the level of depth and value of the reader today than the correct and accurate analysis of the writer of Tadhkirah in recognizing the evolution of the past and encouraging the reader to avoid love and hate, intentions and narrow-mindedness, helping to the typology, classification and periodization of literary trends by combining critical thinking with attitudes towards literary genres and forms, elevation of the level of literary theorizing and accurate and correct analysis of literary texts and mull over ethnic, racial, religious, ideological and political limitations, etc.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
- Ahmade Na’mani, R. (1998). A Review of Persian Biography. Kayhan Farhangi Monthly Journal, 143, 16-21.
- Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2002). Contemporary Critical Theories (Formalism and Structuralism).  2nd Edition. Tehran: Samt Publication.
- Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2006). Fundamentals of Semantic Understanding of the Text in Traditional and Modern Approaches to Literary Criticism. Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities (University of Tabriz), 49, 7-21.
- Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2010). Pathology of the Structure of Commentary in the Field of Understanding the Literary Text (with a Critical Look at Hafez's Commentaries. Journal of Literary Technologies Quarterly, 2(2), 63-80.
- Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2017). The Need to Recognize Critical Thinking as an Interdisciplinary Approach in the Humanities and Literary Criticism. Annual Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Studies. Tehran: International Broadcasting Conferences.
- Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2018). Literary Studies of Textual Hermeneutics. 1st Edition. Tehran: Sokhan Publication.
- Ali-shir-navayi, M. N. A. (1944). Majma’o Al-Nafayes. Translated by Shah Mohammade Qazvini. Tehran: (n.p).
- Amin Razi, A. (n.d). Haft Eqlim (Seven Climates). Tehran: Elmi Publication.
- Asgari, M. (2012). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(2), 35-64.
- Bigdeli, L. A. B. A. (2008). Atashkade Azar (Azar Fire Temple). Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication.
- Bressler, C. (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice). Translated by Mostafa Abedinifar. Tehran: Nilufar Publication.
- Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2016). The Thinker's Guide to Analytic Thinking: How to Take Thinking Apart and What to Look for When You Do: The Elements of Thinking and the Standards They Must Meet. Tehran: Behjat Publication.
- Emmarati Moghaddam, D. (2017). Pathology of the Usage of Modern Theories in Complement of Rhetoric Handbook. Journal of Contemporary Persian Literature, 7(21), 29-74.
- Fotuhi Rud-Ma’jani, M. (2006). Indian Style Literary Criticism. Tehran: Sokhan Publication.
- Fotuhi Rud-Ma’jani, M. (2008). Theory of the History of Literature with a Critical Study of the History of Literature in Iran. Tehran: Elmi Publication
- Hedayat, R. Q. X. (1957). Majma’o Al-fosaha. 1st Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication.
- Mahyar, A. (1998). Literary Reference and Research Methods. 2nd Edition. Tehran: Qatre Publication.
- Meyers, Ch. (1995). Teaching Students to Think Critically. Tehran: Samt Publication.
- Qazi Moradi, H. (2012). An Introduction to Critical Thinking. 1st Edition. Tehran: Dat Publication.
- Qolčin Ma’ani, A. (1984). History of Persian Tadhkirah. Tehran: Sanai Library.
- Rajabi, M., & Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2018). A Critical-Comparative Look at the Traditionalist Approach Theory and Theorizing in the Three Classical Literary Theoretical Works. Journal of Persian Literature (Islamic Azad University), 14(14), 11-27.
- Razi, A. (2010). Pathology of Commentary in the Field of Persian Literary Text. Journal of Literary Matters Quarterly, 43.
- Safa Zabih, A. (2009). The History of Literature in Iran. Tehran: Ferdows Publication.
- Salahshuri, A. (2011). Types of thinking. Hamedan: Bu Ali Sina University Press.
- Samarghandi, D. S. (n.d). Tazkereh Dolatshah Samarghandi. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
- Sattari, J. (1978). Culture and People. 1st Edition. Tehran: High Council of Culture and Arts.
- Shafi’i Kadkani, M. R. (2006). Poetry in the Onslaught of Critics. 2nd Edition. Tehran: Agah Publication.
- Shoqi, Z. (1983). Literary Criticism. 4th Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication.
- Ufi, S. A. (2010). Labab Al-Bab. Tehran: Hermes Publication.
- Zarqani, S. M. (2010).  The Gradual Development of the Tradition of Writing Iranian Literary History. Bustan Adab Journal (Shiraz University), 2(57), 75-101.
- Zarqani, S. M. (2015). Contemporary Discourses and the Tradition of Literary History in Iran. Tehran: Academy Letter.
- Zarrin-kub, A. H. (1993). Familiarity with Literary Criticism. 3rd Edition. Tehran: Sokhan Publication.