Oral-Oriented Teaching of Meter through the Use of Music: Proposing a New Method of Teaching Meter in Poetry

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant professor of Psycho linguistics Institute for Cognitive & Brain Sciences The University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran

3 M. A. Student of Persian Language Teaching, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
The prosodic meter of poetry and rhythm of music both originate from the same source which is the symmetric sequence of sounds in time. Prosody seeks to understand various types of metric lines in poetry. Since the first tool for recognizing and understanding meter is through listening, it would be beneficial that teaching methods to be based on listening and speaking skills. However, teaching methods in most formal educational institutions focus more on the lingual aspects than musical ones. In traditional education methods, the participant should go through the labyrinth of learning traditional prosody to understand and memorize a piece. The difficulties of understanding prosody in classical approaches are rooted in onomastics and the categorization of Bohoor and Zahafat. The principles are not only obstructive but also confuse learners. Vaziri (1314, 1315), Khanlari (1386), Najafi (1391) consider the existence of Zahafat unnecessary and have put them all aside. They have smoothened the path of learning through regulating the exceptions, discretions, and necessities of poetry. According to the authors' experiences, there has not been a proper method for understanding meter and preserving that knowledge for a long-term. The method proposed in this study is the use of music to facilitate learning and long-term memorization of Persian poetry metric lines. This study aims at preventing the hardships and difficulties of learning prosody by updating the learning method and using musical content. With the proposed approach, two goals could be achieved: facilitating the learning while enjoying the process and empowering the long-term memorization of Persian metric lines.
 The first stage of this interdisciplinary study is gathering information from library and literature review. The next is some oral practices. The data procession method was descriptive-analytic. The results show that the educational musical content is necessary for teaching Persian poetry meter. The following order is followed in this paper: First, a summary of findings by other researchers on the effects of music on the brain and learning process and the role of music in teaching is presented. Second, by studying the sources in linguistics and definitions of the natural rhythm of speech, referring to Persian prosody and the theory of music, the constituents of music and prosody are adjusted. Then, the existing difficulties of naming the meters and classifications are analyzed to identify the issues regarding the process of learning prosody (which is the main purpose of this study). Finally, it has been shown that to produce a scientific content of musical learning, the characteristics of prosody should be considered. Knowing the principles of prosody and music is the main factor to offer ways for the use of music in prosody learning.
In composing prosodic melodies, the musical rhythm and note durations are not choosable for the producer since these constituents are unconscious. To produce prosodic melodies, the producer has to choose three-note durations among 21 possible choices. These durations are the eighth note (e), quarter note (q), a dotted quarter note (j) that in the making of musical contents have identical relations with tri-syllable prosody (short, high, and long). Prosodic melodies are the same as Persian meters with syllables having bass capabilities in addition to prosodic ones (regarding duration and sentence structures) with the ability of intervals among durations that makes them capable of being a part of major and minor scales in addition to Iranian Dastgah such as Mahoor, Homayoon, Shoor. Learners can listen to the respective melody repetitively to learn and memorize a verse. By this approach, the prosodic meters are easier to understand without being forced to go through traditional rules. Through studying the sources on traditional prosody and fundamental issues of Bohoor, and new sources on this matter which consider Zahafat unnecessary or even wrong, it could be concluded that learning prosody adds nothing but understanding the forms.  In new prosody, understanding the rules of syllable scanning all depend on understanding the meter first. Learning the meter can be facilitated by using it in repetitive sessions of listening. This practice does not require any professional skill.
The results of this study show that prosody contains a few parts of the musical capabilities. That is, all such capabilities are available in the theory of music. As a result, it is possible to modernize all the rules of Persian poetry through rhythm. Besides, the data provided by this research paves the way for creating educational musical contents with melodic prosody to facilitate learning and long-term memorization of Persian poetry meter.

Keywords


References
- Azaminia, M. (1998). The Ways and Customs of the Houses. Tehran: Sure Press.
- Binesh, T. (1991). Three Treatises on Music: Music Encyclopedia of Ibn Sina, Music Ekhvano-safa Treatises, Kanz-o-altohaf Hasan Kashi. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
- Buban, N. (2009). Rhythmic review of vocabulary bases: official Persian poetry and prose. Journal of Linguistic Research, (1), 101-122.
- Dehkhoda, A. (1993). Dictionary, Under the Supervision of Mohammad Moein and Sayed Jafar Shahidi. Tehran: University of Tehran.
- Dehlavi, H. (2000). The Connection between Poetry and Vocal Music. Tehran: Mahoor Foundation.
- Fesharaki , M. (2009). Three Treatises on Prose. Tehran: The Cultural Elites and Works Institute.
- Forogh, M. (1957-1959). Compilation of music and poetry, Journal of Music, Vol: 3, Tehran.
- Forsat Shirazi, M. (2013). Bohur ol Alhan. Tehran: Moein.
- Grabe, E. and & Ling. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis, Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7, Mouton.
- Hafez, Sh. (1999). Divan, Mohammad Ghazvini and Ghasem Ghani (emend.). Tehran: Borhan.
- Haghshenas, A. (2001). Phonology. Tehran: Agah.
- Hayes, B. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English, Linguistic Inquiry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 15 (1).
- Heydari, A. (2015). Prosthetic impulses are function of precise order, Journal of Literary Techniques, 7 (1), 65-72.
- Jahedjah, A. (2014). Investigation the delay of poetry in the meter of Persian poetry, Journal of Literary Arts, 6, (2), 59-68.
- Kager, R. (1995). Review of Bruce Hayes' metrical stress theory: principles and case studies, Phonology, 12, 437-464.
- Kager, R. (2007). Feet and metrical stress, Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, P. de Lacy (ed.), 195-227, online eversion at:
- Karami, M. (2000). Prose and Rhyme in Persian Poetry. Shiraz: University of Shiraz.
- Khazrayi, B. (2004). Igha’ and igha’ courses in the Safi-o-din Ormavi treatises, Fiction, Academy of Art, 11, 46-57. 
- Kiyani, M. (2015). Rhythm in poetry and music, Journal of Persian Literature, 5, (1).
- Kiyaninezhad , M. (2003). Reed Playing Style. Tehran: Javan Art-house.
- Lee, Ch. S. & Neil P. M. T. (2004). Toward an auditory account of speech rhythm: application of a model of the auditory primal sketch to two multi-language corpora, Cognition, 93, 225-254.
- Magne, C. Aramaki, M., Astesano, C., Gordon, R. L., Ystad, S., Farner, S. & et al. (2004). Comparison of rhythmic processing in language and music: an interdisciplinary approach, Journal of Music and Meaning, No.3, online version at:
- Mallah, H. (1997). The Connection between Poetry and Music. Tehran: Nashr-e Faza.
- Mansuri, P. (1997). Fundamental Theory of Music. Tehran: Nashr-e Karname.
- Mehrani, H. (2010). Composing: Part1: Theoretical foundation of Iranian and Western Music. Published by author.
- Miller, A. (2017). The Effects of Music on Short-Term and Long-Term Memory. The University of Lowa.
- Najafi, A. (2016). The Weight of Persian Poetry. Tehran: Nilufar.
- ------------ (2015). About the meter of Persian Poetry Classification. Tehran: Nilufar.
- Natel Khanlari, P. (2007). The meter of Persian Poetry. Tehran: Tus.
- Purtorab, M. (1988). Music Theory. Tehran: Cheshme.
- Razi, Sh. (2008). Almojam-fi-maaeir-ashar-el-ajam, Mohammad Ghazvini and Modares Razavi (emend.). Tehran: Zavvar.
- Saadi, M. (2003). Divan, Mohammad Ali Forughi (emend.). Tehran: Ghoghnus.
- Salmani, M. & Naser. H. (2018). Classification of prosthetic Persian Poetry, Journal of Literary Arts, 10, 119-134.
- Shafiei Kadkani, M. (1991). Music of Poetry. Tehran: Agah.
- Shamisa, S. (2007). Prose and Rhyme. Tehran: Payam-e Noor University.
- Tusi, N. (2010). Meyarol-ashaar and Mizan-ol-afkar-fi-sharh-e- meyar-ol-ashaar, Mohammad Fesharaki (emend.). Tehran: Miras-e Maktub.
-  Vahidiyan kamyar, T. (1986). Literary Arts and Figures (Prosody), a handbook for the fourth year of high school. Tehran: Ministry of Education press.
- Zandbaf, H. (2016). Rhythm in Music. Tehran: Rozane.