The Earth in the Quran: An Archetypal Symbol of Femininity

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Quranic Studies Department, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Earth is one of the outstanding natural objects in the Qur'an with a variety of roles. Studying the religious history of this cosmic object, researchers have found that it is of high sexual importance among several Semitic tribes and the ancient beliefs of the different regions including the Mesopotamian. Almost in all of these regions, the earth is manifested as a female being, and its gender is female.
The present study intends to examine the earth in this historical- religious context and reveal its feminine manifestations in the Quran. Finally, it discusses the earth's archetypal aspects, based on the Jungian concepts. The main questions are as following: What role does the earth play in the mythical beliefs of the Semitic tribes, and what are its main functions? What is the history of the earth's feminine roles in Semitic cultural beliefs? Can such feminine roles be traced in the Quran? If so, what are the most important manifestations of this femininity in the Quran?; and What is the message of the Qur'an in this regard?
An examination of the Qur'anic verses reveals that the Quran has taken the archetypal advantages of the earth, with its positive approach to the Anima archetype, and has found the various manifestations of the earth's femininity by notions (ideas) such as "the similarity of the woman and the tilth" (Q 2: 232).
According to the results, this archetype mainly makes humans' conscious minds to know the place of Allah in the world and distinguish His power and high position from those of the earth. In other words, such verses seek to reject the beliefs of those pagans who worshiped the earth or thought that the earth is superior to Allah.
The Quranic hint at mythological beliefs on the similarity of “the woman and the field” (farm), on the one hand, is to emphasize the sanctity of marriage, introduce it as a religious ritual and then pay attention to its spiritual purpose, and on the other hand, is to advise better communication with women, that is, a proper, pleasant and harmless sexual relationship.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
- The Qur’an.
- The Bible.
- Ackerman, P. (2008). A survey of Persian art, from prehistoric times to the present, Najafe Darya-bandari (trans.). Tehran: Elmi& Farhangi.
- Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and Gender in Islam, Fatema Sadeghi (trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Ayazi, M.A. (2008). The Quran and modern interpretation. Tehran: The Book of Islamic Culture Publication
- Azhari, M. (2001). Tahzib al-luqa (Language refinement). Beirut: Dar al-Ehya’ al-Torath al-‘Arabi.
- Babaī, A., Azīzī-kīya, Q. & Rowhanī-rad, M. (1414). The methodology of Quran Interpretation. 2nd ed. Qom: Research center of Hoze and Academy.
- Berland, K. A. (2008). Myths of life and death. Roqayyeh Behzadi (trans.). Tehran: Elm.
- Burkitt. M. (1963). The Old Stone Age. 4th ed. London: Atheneum.
- Ebn ‘Ashur, M. (1999). Al- Tahrir & al-Tanvir (Writing and Enlightenment). Beirut: al- Tarikh.
- Ebne Duraid, M. (n.d.). Jomharat al- Luqat. Beyrut: Dar al-‘elm lel-Mollaiin.
- Ebne Fares. (1982). Mo’jame Maqayīso-lluqat. Tahqīqe Abdol- Salam Mohammad Harun. [n.p.]: Maktabol-E’Lamel-Eslamī.
- Ebne Manzur, M. (1993). Lesanol-‘arab. Beyrut: Darol-fekr.
- Ebne Seyyeda al-Morsi, A. (2000). Al-Mohkam & al-Mohit al-‘azam. Beyrut: Dar al-Kotob al-‘elmiyyah.
- Eliade, M. (1993). Traite d'histoire des religions. Jalal Satarī (trans.). Tehran: Sorush.
- Eliade, M. (1983). Aspects du Mythe. Jalal Satari (trans.). Tehran: Toos.
- Eliade, M. (1996). Sacré et le profane. Jalal Satari (trans.), 2nd. Tehran: Sorush.
- Eliade, M. (2014). Symbolism, the sacred, and the arts, Mohammad Kazem Mohajeri (trans.). Tehran: Parse.
- Emig, R. (2001). Literary criticism and psychoanalytic positions, The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Christa Knellwolf and Christoper Norris (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, V.IX.
- Fanian, Kh. (1972). Worship of the mother goddess in Iran, Historical  Surveys, 43, 209-248.
- Farahidy, Kh. (1989). Al-'eyn. Qom: Hejrat.
- Ferants, M.L. F. (1973). Man and his symbol. Abutaleb Taromi (trans.). Tehran: Amir Kabir.
- Frazier, J.J. (2013). The golden bough. Kazem Firozmand (trans.), 7th ed. Tehran: Agah.
- Qaemī, F. (2010). Background and foundations of the theory of mythical critique and how it is used in reading literary texts. Literary Criticism, 12, 33-56.
- Qureshi. A.A. (1998). Tafsir Ahsan al- Hadith. Tehran: Be’that.
- Grin, V. (1998). A handbook of critical approaches to literature, Zahra Mihan-khah (trans.). Tehran: Etela’at.
- Girshman, R. (1976). L'Iran des Origines al Islam. Mohammad Mo’in. 4th ed. Tehran: Translation and Publication Company.
- Jiran, F. (2010). The myths of Greece, Abo-Al-Ghasem Isma’il Pur Motlagh (trans.), 4th ed. Tehran: Ghatreh.
- Jordan, M. (2004). Encyclopedia of Gods: Dictionary of Gods and Goddesses. 2nd ed. Kyle Cathie Limited, Printed in the United States of America.
- Kampel, J. (1998). The Power of Myth. Abbas Mokhber (trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
- Lahigi, Sh. (1992). Recognizing the identity of Iranian women in history and prehistory, 4th ed. Tehran: Roshangaran.
- Ma’refat, M.H. (2002). Shobahat & Rodude Holule Quran. Qom: Al-tamhid Institute.
- Madani. A. (2005). Al-Traz al-awal. Mashhad: Al al-Bayt le Ehya’ al-Torath.
- Mostafavi. H. (1941). Al- Tahqiq fi Kalamat al-Quran al- Karim. Tehran: Translation and Publication Company
- Mohagheghian, Z. (2017). The divine feminine principle in the Qur'an. Motale’at-e Quran & Hadith, 2, 93-118.
ــ --------------------. (2019). The archetype of the sacred marriage in the Quran. Journal of Naqd Adabi, 12 (45), 111- 151.
ــ --------------------. (2020). A new Interpretation of Surah al-Zalzalah based on the Anthropological approach. Journal of Afagh al-Hezarata al-Eslamiyyah, 44, 1- 30.
- Namvar Motlagh, B. (2013). An Introduction to Mythology: Theories and Applications. Tehran: Sokhan.
- Narayan.R. K. (1972). The Ramayana, USA: Penguin Group
- Nyberg, B. (1931). Kind und Erde. Hilsinki, 69, 213- 230.
- Pakatchi, A. (2017). The Conversation. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
ــ -----------------. (2012). Lectures on Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
- Saheb Ibn ‘Ebad, A. (1993). Arabic dictionary. Beirut: 'Alam al-Kotob.
- Sholts, D. (2002). Theories of Personality. Yusof Karimi. (trans.). Tehran: Arasbaran.
- Shovaliye, J. & Gerbran, A. (1999). Dictionnaire des Symboles: Mythes, Reves, Coutumes. Tehran: Jeyhun.
- Smith, W. R. (1894). Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: The Fundamental Institutions. London: Adam & Charles Black.
- Sophocles (1982). Oedipus Rex (Cambridge Greek & Latin Classics). Cambridge University Press.
ــ --------------------. (2003). Antigone. Reginald Gibbons and Charles Segal (trans.). Oxford University Press.
- Tabarsi, F. (1997). Compendium of Elucidations on the Exegesis of the Quran. Tehran: Khosrow.
- Tabatabayi, M. H. (1996). Interpretation of the Quran. Qom: Jame’e Modaresīne Hoze Elmīye Qom.
- Yung, C. G. (1980). Man and his symbols, Hasan Akbarīyane Tabari (trans.), 3rd ed. Tehran: Dayere.
ــ --------------------. (2012). Man and his symbols, Abu Taleb Saremi (trans.), Tehran: Amir Kabir.
ــ --------------------. (2017). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious,Farnaze Ganjīva Mohammadbaqer Isma'ilpur (trans.). Tehran: Jami.
ــ --------------------. (2006). Problems de l'ame Modern. Mahmud Behforuzifard (trans.). Tehran: Jami.  
ــ --------------------. (1989). Four Archetypes; Mother, Rebirth Spirit, Trickster. Parvīze Faramarzī. (trans.). Mashhad: Astan-e Qods-e Razavī.
ــ --------------------. (2011). Mysterium Coniunctionis: an Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy. Parvīze Faramarzi (trans.), 2nd ed. Mashhad: Beh Nashr.
- Zamakhshari, M. (1966). Arabic-Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Islamic Studies Institute.